EOIR确定2027财年移民法院申请费通胀调整方案

Document Headings

Document headings vary by document type but may contain the following:

See the Document Drafting Handbook for more details.

( printed page 54211)

Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice.

Final rule.

The Department of Justice (“Department”) is making inflationary adjustments to immigration-related fees for filings with the Executive Office for Immigration Review (“EOIR”) as required by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act for Fiscal Year (“FY”) 2027.

This rule is effective October 1, 2026.

Jamee E. Comans, Assistant Director, Office of Policy, Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2500, Falls Church, Virginia 22041, telephone (703) 305-0289 (not a toll-free call).

On July 4, 2025, a congressional budget reconciliation bill (H.R. 1), commonly referred to as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”), became law. Public Law 119-21, 139 Stat. 72. As relevant here, OBBBA introduced new required immigration-related fees for EOIR applications, motions, and appeals beginning in FY 2025 (“OBBBA fees”) and mandated that the Attorney General annually update these OBBBA fees for inflation. See8 U.S.C. 1802, 1808, 1812. This rule updates the relevant EOIR regulatory fee schedules to adjust the OBBBA fees for inflation for FY 2027 in accordance with OBBBA's mandate.

In doing so, the Department notes that this rule does not change any fee amounts collected under section 286(m) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA” or “Act”), 8 U.S.C. 1356(m), nor does this rule make any changes to fee exceptions or waivers. Additionally, EOIR's regulatory fee schedule does not contain fee amounts for application forms published by the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), though those fees that are collected by EOIR will be updated on EOIR's website and the EOIR Payment Portal. See8 CFR 1103.7(d)(4)(ii) (“The fees for applications published by the Department of Homeland Security and used in immigration proceedings are governed by 8 CFR 103.7 and 8 CFR part 106.”).

OBBBA requires that all EOIR-collected OBBBA fees be adjusted annually for inflation and directs that a specific adjustment formula be applied to each fee. See8 U.S.C. 1802, 1808, 1812. For all OBBBA fees, the inflation-adjusted amount is calculated by adding: (1) the amount of the OBBBA fee required for the most recently concluded fiscal year to (2) the product resulting from multiplying the OBBBA fee required for the most recently concluded fiscal year by the percentage (if any) by which the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”) for the month of July (in this case July 2026), preceding the date on which such adjustment takes effect, exceeds the CPI-U for the same month of the preceding calendar year (in this case July 2025), either rounded down to the nearest multiple of $10, see8 U.S.C. 1802(c), 1812(a)(2)(B), or, for the Annual Asylum Fee (“AAF”), rounded down to the nearest dollar. See8 U.S.C. 1808(b)(2). The CPI-U percent change for calculating FY 2027 OBBBA fees is 3.4 percent.[1]

The table below shows the total FY 2027 EOIR fee amounts by calculating the FY 2027 OBBBA fees using the formula described above, and then adding these updated OBBBA fee amounts to the preexisting EOIR fees under section 286(m) of the Act.

The FY 2027 filing fee amounts will be required for any relevant filings with the Immigration Courts or the Board of Immigration Appeals filed on or after October 1, 2026 (the first day of FY 2027). EOIR will continue to reject any filings that are not accompanied by a proper filing fee or request for an applicable fee waiver.

EOIR will update these amounts annually as required, including on its website and the EOIR Payment Portal. See, e.g., EOIR, Types of Appeals, Motions, and Required Fees (Feb. 18, 2026), https://www.justice.gov/​eoir/​types-appeals-motions-and-required-fees [ https://perma.cc/​Q6CM-HKWN]; EOIR, EOIR Forms (May 4, 2026), https://www.justice.gov/​eoir/​eoir-forms [ https://perma.cc/​CD9M-7FLK]; EOIR, EOIR Payment Portal (June 22, 2026), https://epay.eoir.justice.gov/​index [ https://perma.cc/​LF3L-VACV].

Under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), agencies generally must provide “notice of proposed rule making” in the Federal Register and, after such notice, “give interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of written data, views, or arguments.” 5 U.S.C. 553(b)-(c). The APA further provides that the required publication or service of a substantive rule shall be made not less than 30 days before its effective date, except in certain circumstances. Id. 553(d).

However, pursuant to the APA, a rule is excepted from notice-and-comment procedures when an agency for good cause finds that such procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). A rule is also excepted from the delayed-effective-date requirement when good cause is found by the agency to forgo this requirement and is published with the rule. Id. 553(d)(3); Riverbend Farms, Inc. v. Madigan, 958 F.2d 1479, 1485 (9th Cir. 1992) (differentiating the APA's two “good cause” exceptions: 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), which applies to the notice and comment process, and 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), which applies to the delayed effective date).

As discussed above, OBBBA requires the Attorney General to annually update EOIR-collected OBBBA fees for inflation using a statutorily prescribed formula. See8 U.S.C. 1802, 1808, 1812. Therefore, the notice-and-comment and delayed-effective-date requirements are unnecessary because the Department is bound to comply with OBBBA's inflation adjustment requirements and, thus, the changes made by this rule are purely ministerial. See, e.g., Metzenbaum v. FERC, 675 F.2d 1282, 1291 (D.C. Cir. 1982) (explaining notice and comment was unnecessary under the APA good cause exception for “nondiscretionary acts” as it would be a “futile gesture”).

This rule does not trigger the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act because, as explained above, the Department is not required “to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking” prior to issuing this rule. See5 U.S.C. 604(a).

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,58 FR 51735 (Sept. 30, 1993), and Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,76 FR 3821 (Jan. 18, 2011), each direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health, and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 further emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.

The Department has determined that this rule is not a “significant regulatory action” under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. Nevertheless, the Department certifies that this regulation has been drafted in accordance with the principles laid out in Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.

This rule merely updates pertinent EOIR fee amounts to be consistent with the fee changes required by statute. Accordingly, any changes made by this rule do not impose a cost upon the public beyond the terms of the statute. Likewise, these regulatory changes provide clarity, which benefits the public and helps avoid confusion over the current fee amounts. Thus, the changes made by this rule do not impact the public in a way that would place it in tension with the principles set forth in Executive Orders 12866 or 13563.

This rule is not a regulatory action under Executive Order 14192, Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,90 FR 9065 (Jan. 31, 2025), because it is being issued with ( printed page 54213) respect to an immigration-related function of the United States.

Executive Order 14294, Overcriminalization of Federal Regulations,90 FR 20363 (May 9, 2025), requires agencies promulgating regulations with criminal regulatory offenses potentially subject to criminal enforcement to explicitly describe the conduct subject to criminal enforcement, the authorizing statutes, and the mens rea standard applicable to each element of those offenses. This rule does not create a criminal regulatory offense and is thus exempt from Executive Order 14294 requirements.

This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (inflation adjusted) in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, Public Law 104-4, 109 Stat. 48 (codified at 2 U.S.C. 1501-1571).

This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, Federalism,64 FR 43255 (Aug. 4, 1999), the Department has determined that this rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.

This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform,61 FR 4729 (Feb. 5, 1996).

This rule does not propose new or revised “collection[s] of information” as that term is defined under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13, 109 Stat. 163 (codified at 44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), and its implementing regulations, 5 CFR part 1320. However, the Department notes that EOIR is separately making de minimis changes to EOIR forms to update the fee amounts on the forms in light of the inflation adjustments required by OBBBA.

This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the Congressional Review Act. 5 U.S.C. 804.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, and by the authority vested in the Acting Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, by Attorney General Order Number 6260-2025, the Department amends part 1103 of title 8 of the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 1103 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1101, 1103, 1304, 1356, 1801, 1802, 1808, 1812; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 28 U.S.C. 509, 510.

2. Amend § 1103.7 by revising table 1 to paragraph (b)(1), table 2 to paragraph (b)(2), and table 3 to apragraph (b)(4)(i), to read as follows:

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(1) * * *

Table 1 to Paragraph ( b )( 1 )

(2) * * *

Table 2 to Paragraph ( b )( 2 )

Table 3 to Paragraph ( b )( 4 )( i )

Sirce E. Owen,

Acting Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Department of Justice.

1.   See U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Economic News Release, Consumer Price Index—July 2026 (Aug. 12, 2026), https://www.bls.gov/​news.release/​cpi.nr0.htm [ https://perma.cc/​97AW-798N].

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2026-17146 Filed 8-20-26; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-30-P