USCIS更新政策手册中关于证据标准、RFE和NOID的指南
发布日期 2026年8月5日
USCIS于2026年8月5日宣布更新政策手册中有关证据标准、补充证据请求(RFE)和拒绝意向通知(NOID)的指南。公告中未说明具体变更内容。
要点
- USCIS更新了政策手册中关于证据、作出决定以及决定后续行动的章节。
- 具体变更的标准或内容在来源中未详细说明。
- 受影响的章节为1 USCIS-PM E.6、E.9和E.10。
- 来源中未说明生效日期或实施细节。
影响对象
可能收到RFE或NOID的申请人、申请单位及其律师可能受到影响。
建议行动
由于来源未说明具体变更内容,建议直接查阅USCIS政策手册更新后的相关章节。
全文翻译
官方原文全文已于 2026-10-12 保存在本站。即使原链接变更或被删除,仍可在此查看全文。译文由 AI 逐段翻译,仅英文原文具有法律效力。
美国国土安全部 美国公民及移民服务局 www.uscis.gov 美国公民及移民服务局局长办公室 坎普斯普林斯,马里兰州 20588-0009 PA-2026-05 2026年8月5日 政策通告 主题:证据、补充证据请求和拟拒绝通知 目的 美国公民及移民服务局(USCIS)正在更新《USCIS政策手册》中关于证据标准、补充证据请求(RFE)和拟拒绝通知(NOID)的政策指南。
U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services www.uscis.gov U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Office of the Director Camp Springs, MD 20588-0009 PA- 2026-05 August 5, 2026 Policy Alert SUBJECT: Evidence, Requests for Evidence, and Notices of Intent to Deny Purpose U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) is updating policy guidance in the USCIS Policy Manual regarding evidentiary standards, Requests for Evidence (RFEs), and Notices of Intent to Deny (NOIDs).
背景 在裁决移民福利申请时,USCIS会将与福利申请相关提交的任何相关证据作为申请的一部分予以考虑。1 举证责任在于申请人,其须证明在提出福利申请时具备所申请福利的资格,并在裁决期间持续保持该资格。2 如果申请人满足证明资格的举证责任,并且在法律或法规要求的情况下,证明其应获得自由裁量权的有利行使,3 USCIS官员将批准该福利申请。在申请人未能满足举证责任的情况下,USCIS官员将拒绝该福利申请。 国土安全部(DHS)于1994年制定了关于裁决移民福利申请和申请书的法规。4 根据该法规,USCIS在适当情况下有权自由裁量是否就移民福利申请发出补充证据请求(RFE)和拟拒绝通知(NOID)。5 一般而言,在包括但不限于以下各种情况下,USCIS拥有完全的自由裁量权,可在不先发出RFE或NOID的情况下直接拒绝申请:福利申请无批准的法律依据,或申请人未能提供所需的初始证据。6 根据USCIS此前的政策,官员被指示在福利申请人未能提交初始证据,或记录未能证明所寻求福利的资格时,发出RFE或NOID。此前的政策为轻率或严重不完整的申请创造了可乘之机,并且在许多情况下被利用来获取与该福利申请相关的附带利益,或出于与申请本身无直接关系的其他原因。1 参见8 CFR 103.2(b)。
Background When adjudicating immigration benefit requests, USCIS considers any relevant evidence submitted in connection with the benefit request as part of the request.1 The burden is on the requestor to establish that he or she is eligible for the requested benefit at the time of filing the benefit request and that he or she continues to be eligible through adjudication.2 If the requestor meets the burden of proof to establish eligibility and, where required by statute or regulation, that the requestor warrants a favorable exercise of discretion,3 USCIS officers approve the benefit request. In cases where the requestor does not meet the burden of proof, USCIS officers deny the benefit request. DHS established regulations for the adjudication of petitions and applications for immigration benefits in 1994.4 Under the regulations, USCIS has discretion to issue RFEs and NOIDs for immigration benefit requests in appropriate circumstances.5 Generally, USCIS has full discretion to deny the request without first issuing an RFE or NOID in various situations including, but not limited to, when the benefit request has no legal basis for approval or when the requestor fails to provide required initial evidence.6 Under USCIS’ previous policy, officers were instructed to issue an RFE or NOID when a benefit requestor failed to submit initial evidence, or when the record failed to establish eligibility for the benefit sought. The prior policy created opportunities for frivolous or substantially incomplete filings, and in many cases was exploited to secure ancillary benefits associated with the benefit 1 See 8 CFR 103.2(b).
2 参见《移民与国籍法》(INA)第291条。参见8 CFR 103.2(b)。
2 See INA 291. See 8 CFR 103.2(b).
3 参见《移民与国籍法》(INA)第291条。
3 See INA 291.
4 参见《关于特定移民福利申请和申请书的处理程序变更》,59 FR 1455(1994年1月11日)。
4 See Changes in Processing Procedures for Certain Applications and Petitions for Immigration Benefits, 59 FR 1455 (Jan. 11, 1994).
5 参见8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)。某些移民福利,例如难民和庇护申请,受不同法规和程序管辖,涉及RFE、NOID、拒绝及未出庭等事项。 6 参见8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(ii)。
5 See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8). Certain immigration benefits, such as refugee and asylum applications, are governed by different regulations and procedures regarding RFEs, NOIDs, denials, and failure to appear . 6 See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(ii).
PA-2026-05:证据、补充证据请求和拟拒绝通知 第2页 该政策助长了在记录未能证明资格或福利申请人未能按照法律、法规或表格说明提交初始所需证据的情况下,官员在不先发出RFE或NOID的情况下行使自由裁量权拒绝福利申请的做法受到抑制。
PA-2026-05: Evidence, Requests for Evidence, and Notices of Intent to Deny Page: 2 request or for other reasons not directly related to the request itself. It discouraged officers from exercising discretion to deny the benefit request, without first issuing an RFE or NOID, when the record failed to establish eligibility or when the benefit requestor failed to submit initial required evidence in accordance with statute, regulation, or form instructions.
同样,美国公民及移民服务局(USCIS)此前的政策鼓励官员在福利申请人提交很少或未提交证据时发出补充证据通知(NOID),尽管国土安全部(DHS)的相关法规要求福利申请人在提交申请时即须确立其资格,且每份福利申请均须依照适用法规及美国公民及移民服务局的指示,连同所有必需的初始证据一并妥善提交。7 此前的政策延长了审理时间,提高了成本,而该成本通过申请费转嫁给所有福利申请人,并助长了诸如恶意申请和占位申请等不良申请行为,以求获取附带利益。因此,为切实执行相关法规,当福利申请人未能提交全部所需的初始证据时,美国公民及移民服务局可自行决定以缺乏初始证据或不符合资格为由拒绝该福利申请,或就缺失的初始证据发出补充证据请求(RFE)。美国公民及移民服务局的新政策将通过遏制恶意申请、占位申请或不完整申请,并要求申请人通过提交完整的福利申请来履行其举证责任,从而提高高效审理福利申请的能力。未附具所需初始证据而提交的福利申请实际上妨碍了美国公民及移民服务局高效确定资格的能力。此项更新后的政策确保福利申请人无论是无意还是故意,均不得妨碍美国公民及移民服务局作出决定的能力,从而获得潜在或实际的利益。
Similarly, USCIS’ previous policy encouraged officers to issue a NOID when a benefit requestor submitted little or no evidence, despite DHS regulations requiring the benefit requestor establish eligibility at the time of filing the benefit request and that each benefit request be properly filed with all initial evidence required by applicable regulations and USCIS instructions.7 This prior policy increased processing times, raised costs which are transferred to all benefit requestors through filing fees, and encouraged nefarious filing practices such as frivolous and placeholder filings to secure ancillary benefits. Therefore, in order to faithfully implement the regulations, when a benefit requestor fails to submit all required initial evidence, USCIS in its discretion may deny the benefit request for lack of initial evidence or for ineligibility or issue an RFE for the missing initial evidence. USCIS’ new policy will improve its ability to efficiently adjudicate benefit requests by discouraging frivolous, placeholder, or incomplete filings and requiring the requestor to meet his or her burden of proof by submitting complete benefit requests. The filing of a benefit request without the required initial evidence effectively hampers USCIS’ ability to efficiently determine eligibility. This updated policy ensures that benefit requestors are not allowed to either inadvertently or intentionally hamper USCIS’ ability to render a decision and as a result gain a potential or actual benefit.
据此,美国公民及移民服务局正在更新其政策指南,以恢复美国公民及移民服务局官员在无需先行发出补充证据请求(RFE)或意向拒绝通知(NOID)的情况下拒绝此类福利申请的完全裁量权,此为相关法规所允许。当美国公民及移民服务局发出补充证据请求时,相关法规规定,该通知“应注明答复截止日期,但在任何情况下,补充证据请求所规定的最长答复期限不得超过十二周,意向拒绝通知所规定的最长答复期限不得超过三十日。不得就补充证据请求或意向拒绝通知准予额外的答复时间。”8 此外,当通知以邮寄方式送达时,答复截止日期应顺延3日。9 此前的政策要求官员遵循标准时限,通常提供最长十二周的答复期限。该政策还规定,当补充证据请求或意向拒绝通知邮寄至美国境外时,额外增加14日的答复期限,此做法有违法规规定。美国公民及移民服务局现正更新其指南,以遵循法规及程序要求。根据相关法规,官员并非必须按标准十二周答复期限发出补充证据请求,而仅需确保最长答复期限不超过十二周。此外,美国公民及移民服务局不再为邮寄至美国境外的通知提供额外14日的答复期限,因为相关法规仅允许对以邮寄方式送达的通知额外增加3日。7 参见8 CFR 103.2(b)(1)及8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(ii)。与此相对,8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(iii)规定,当福利申请人提交了全部所需初始证据,但所提交的证据不足以确立资格时,发出意向拒绝通知可能是适当的。
Accordingly, USCIS is updating its policy guidance to restore USCIS officers’ full discretion to deny such benefit requests without first issuing an RFE or NOID, as allowed by the regulations. When USCIS issues an RFE, the regulations state that the notice “will indicate the deadline for response, but in no case shall the maximum response period provided in a[n RFE] exceed twelve weeks, nor shall the maximum response time provided in a [NOID] exceed thirty days. Additional time to respond to a[n RFE] or [NOID] may not be granted.”8 Further, when notices are served by mail, 3 days are added to the response deadline.9 Previous policy required officers to follow standard timeframes by generally providing the maximum 12-week response period. It also added an additional 14 days to the response deadline when RFEs or NOIDs were mailed outside the United States, in contravention of regulation. USCIS is now updating its guidance to follow regulatory and procedural requirements. Under the regulations, officers are not required to issue an RFE with a standard 12-week response period, but rather the maximum response period cannot exceed 12 weeks. Additionally, USCIS no longer provides benefit requestors an additional 14 days to respond to notices mailed outside the United States, as the regulations only allow for an additional 3 days for notices served by mail. 7 See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(1) and 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(ii). In contrast, 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(iii) states that a NOID may be appropriate when the benefit requestor submits all required initial evidence, but the evidence submitted does not establish eligibility.
8 参见8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(iv)。
8 See 8 CFR 103.2(b)(8)(iv).
9 参见8 CFR 103.8(b)。
9 See 8 CFR 103.8(b).
PA-2026-05:证据、证据请求和拟拒绝通知 第3页 这项关于证据、证据请求(RFE)和拟拒绝通知(NOID)的更新指导使美国公民及移民服务局(USCIS)的政策与法规保持一致,这反过来为USCIS官员提供了明确性,促进了裁决的一致性,为福利申请人设定了明确的预期和准则,鼓励福利申请人勤勉提交所需的初始证据,阻止了某些福利申请人在提交不完整的福利申请时获得不公平优势,而其他申请人则等待获得所有必要证据,从而确保优先日期和其他福利得到公平对待,并与利益相关方建立信任。USCIS尚未发现以往政策可能造成的任何重大信赖利益。相反,尽管有法定和法规要求以及表格说明,但认为USCIS将允许福利申请人提交法律上不充分的申请,之后在裁决过程中再予以更正的这种预期,鼓励了轻率的申请并增加了处理时间,这正是本政策指导旨在解决的问题。本指导载于《政策手册》第1卷,自发布之日起立即生效,适用于在发布之日或之后待决或提交的福利申请。《政策手册》中所载的指导具有约束力,并取代任何相关的先前指导。
PA-2026-05: Evidence, Requests for Evidence, and Notices of Intent to Deny Page: 3 This updated guidance on evidence, RFEs, and NOIDs realigns USCIS policy with regulations, which in turn provides clarity for USCIS officers, promotes consistency across adjudications, sets clear expectations and guidelines for benefit requestors, encourages benefit requestors to be diligent in submitting required initial evidence, discourages unfair advantages accruing to some benefit requestors who submit incomplete benefit requests while others wait to obtain all necessary evidence ensuring that priority dates and other benefits are accorded fairly, and builds trust with stakeholders. USCIS has not identified any significant reliance interests that may have been caused by the previous policies. To the contrary, the expectation that USCIS will allow benefit requestors to submit legally insufficient requests to be corrected later in the adjudication process, notwithstanding the statutory and regulatory requirements and form instructions, encourages frivolous filings and increases processing times, which is a problem that this policy guidance aims to address. This guidance, contained in Volume 1 of the Policy Manual, is effective immediately and applies to benefit requests pending or filed on or after the publication date. The guidance contained in the Policy Manual is controlling and supersedes any related prior guidance.
政策要点
Policy Highlights
澄清初始证据与补充证据、主要证据与次要证据之间的区别,以及代替主要或次要证据提交的宣誓书所获得的证据权重。
Clarifies the distinction between initial and additional evidence, primary and secondary evidence, and the evidentiary weight given to affidavits submitted in lieu of primary or secondary evidence.
澄清USCIS可自行决定,在所有所需初始证据未随福利申请一并提交的情况下,因未能证明符合资格所需的初始证据不足而拒绝该福利申请,而无需先发出证据请求(RFE)或拟拒绝通知(NOID)。
Clarifies that USCIS, in its discretion, may deny the benefit request for failure to establish eligibility based on lack of required initial evidence without first issuing an RFE or NOID in cases where all required initial evidence is not submitted with the benefit request.
将证据请求(RFE)和拟拒绝通知(NOID)所提供的答复时间和额外邮寄时间重新调整,以符合法规准则,无论所在地点如何;此前,USCIS为国际函件提供14天的额外邮寄时间。
Realigns the response time and additional mailing time provided for RFEs and NOIDs to conform to the regulatory guidelines, regardless of location; previously, USCIS provided 14 days of additional mailing time for international correspondence.
澄清当USCIS收到任何针对证据请求(RFE)或拟拒绝通知(NOID)的答复证据时,即使该证据仅部分回应了该RFE或NOID,USCIS也将此类答复视为要求作出决定的请求。
Clarifies that when USCIS receives any requested evidence in response to an RFE or NOID, even if the evidence only partially responds to the RFE or NOID, that USCIS considers such response as a request for a decision.
变更摘要 受影响章节:第1卷 > E部分 > 第6章,证据
Summary of Changes Affected Section: Volume 1 > Part E > Chapter 6, Evidence
全章修订。
Revises Chapter throughout.
受影响章节:第1卷 > E部分 > 第9章 > B节,拒绝
Affected Section: Volume > 1 > Part E > Chapter 9 > Section B, Denials
修订第1小节(基于缺乏法律依据的拒绝)下的第一段。
Revises first paragraph under Subsection 1 (Denials Based on Lack of Legal Basis).
PA-2026-05:证据、证据请求和拟拒绝通知 第4页 受影响章节:第1卷 > E部分 > 第10章 > D节,撤销、废止或终止
PA-2026-05: Evidence, Requests for Evidence, and Notices of Intent to Deny Page: 4 Affected Section: Volume > 1 > Part E > Chapter 10 > Section D, Revocation, Rescission, or Termination
对第4段和第5段作少量修订。
Makes minor edits to 4th and 5th paragraphs.
删除最后一段。
Deletes final paragraph.
USCIS还可能根据本次更新作出其他与之相符的次要技术性、文体性和一致性修改。
USCIS may also make other minor technical, stylistic, and conforming changes consistent with this update.
引用 第1卷:总体政策和程序,E部分,裁决,第6章,证据 [1 USCIS-PM E.6];第9章,作出决定 [1 USCIS-PM E.9];以及第10章,决定后行动 [1 USCIS-PM E.10]。
Citation Volume 1: General Policies and Procedures, Part E, Adjudications, Chapter 6, Evidence [1 USCIS- PM E.6]; Chapter 9, Rendering a Decision [1 USCIS-PM E.9]; and Chapter 10, Post-Decision Actions [1 USCIS-PM E.10].